抖阴短视频

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon will send almost 4,000 additional American forces to Afghanistan, a Trump administration official said, hoping to break a stalemate in a war that has now passed to a third US commander in chief. The deployment will be the largest of American manpower under Donald Trump鈥檚 young presidency.
The decision by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis could be announced as early as next week, the official said. It follows Trump鈥檚 move to give Mattis the authority to set troop levels and seeks to address assertions by the top US commander in Afghanistan that he does not have enough forces to help Afghanistan鈥檚 army against a resurgent Taliban insurgency.
The rising threat posed by Daesh extremists, evidenced in a rash of deadly attacks in the capital city of Kabul, has only fueled calls for a stronger US presence, as have several recent American combat deaths.
The bulk of the additional troops will train and advise Afghan forces, according to the administration official, who was not authorized to discuss details of the decision publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. A smaller number would be assigned to counterterror operations against the Taliban and Daesh, the official said.
Asked for comment, a Pentagon Spokesman Navy Capt. Jeff Davis said: 鈥淣o decisions have been made.鈥�
Daulat Waziri, spokesman for Afghanistan鈥檚 Defense Ministry was reluctant to comment on specifics Friday but said the Afghan government supports the US decision to send more troops. 鈥淭he US knows we are in the fight against terrorism, 鈥� he said. 鈥淲e want to finish this war in Afghanistan with the help of the NATO alliance.鈥�
Afghan lawmaker Nasrullah Sadeqizada, however, was skeptical about additional troops and cautioned that the troop surge should be coordinated with the Afghan government and should not be done unilaterally by the US. 鈥淭he security situation continues to deteriorate in Afghanistan and the foreign troops who are here are not making it better,鈥� he said.
Although Trump has delegated authority for US troop numbers in Afghanistan, the responsibility for America鈥檚 wars and the men and women who fight in them rests on his shoulders. Trump has inherited America鈥檚 longest conflict with no clear endpoint or a defined strategy for American success, though US troop levels are far lower than they were under presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. In 2009, Obama authorized a surge of 30,000 troops into Afghanistan, bringing the total there to more than 100,000, before drawing down over the rest of his presidency.
Trump has barely spoken about Afghanistan as a candidate or president, concentrating instead on crushing Daesh in Syria and Iraq. His predecessors both had hoped to win the war. Bush scored a quick success, helping allied militant groups oust the Taliban shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, before seeing the gains slip away as America鈥檚 focus shifted to the Iraq war. In refocusing attention on Afghanistan, Obama eliminated much of the country鈥檚 Al-Qaeda network and authorized the mission that killed Osama Bin Laden, but failed to snuff out the Taliban鈥檚 rebellion. Mattis鈥� deployment of more troops will be far smaller than Obama鈥檚.
While military leaders have consistently said more forces are needed, a decision had been tied up in a lengthy, wider debate about America鈥檚 long-term military, diplomatic and economic strategy for ending the war. Gen. John Nicholson, the top US commander there, has said the troops are necessary to properly train and advise the Afghan military and perform work handled at greater cost by contractors. Afghan leaders endorse the idea of more US troops, having lost significant ground to the Taliban in recent months.
But, despite repeated questions from Congress this week, Mattis would not reveal his thinking on a troop increase. He said that while counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan are making progress in weakening Al-Qaeda and Daesh, 鈥渢heir defeat will come about only by giving our men and women on the ground the support and the authorities they need to win.鈥�